Tuesday, April 25, 2006
Witherington on the "Code"
http://benwitherington.blogspot.com/
See also a good article for pastors:
http://www.lifeway.com/lwc/article_main_page/0%2C1703%2CA%3D162232&M%3D150035%2C00.html
Monday, April 24, 2006
Baptists and Public Schools
I have never made a statement from the pulpit about this issue, nor do I plan to. I recognize the absolute sovereignty of parents to make the decision about their child's education. God has given each of us a very short-term stewardship over our kids, and parents must do what they believe is God's will in this matter. My wife and I have sent out children to public schools. We believe Christian kids are needed in schools as "salt and light." By and large, we believe we have gotten good results. My son graduates in May and my daughter is a 10th grader. Both are great Christian kids who have had influence among their peers. Our decision was the right one. I would never tell a parent who decided on another course that their's was the wrong one.
I have disagreed with attempts to pass a resolution at recent Southern Baptist Conventions which held up homeschooling over public education. I also disgaree with statments such as the one publicized over the weekend. Parents should pray and allow the Lord to lead them on this issue, keeping the best intersts of their children in mind. Church leaders should stay out of it.
Friday, April 21, 2006
Death Rate
Pastor as Theologian
http://www.albertmohler.com/
I tell students that in today's climate, the pastor must also be an apologist. No longer can the pastor be ignorant of the beliefs of other religions and cults. He does not need to be an interfaith expert, but he does need to know basic information. A good place to get some of that basic info is www.namb.net , then click on "Sharing Christ", then "Equipping Churches." There you'll be able to download basic belief charts of major religions and cults.
Monday, April 17, 2006
Easter Sermon
Title: The Meaning of Easter
You can believe Jesus rose from the dead, as in many opinion polls, but do you know what Easter means?
- It Means Jesus Is Who He Says He Is--In essence, I spoke of His proclamation as the "I Am". I then briefly discussed the "I Am" statements found in John. He also proclaimed Himself as the Son of Man. I dealt here with Daniel 7:13-14 and some key statements found in Matthew [9:6; 12:8; 16:27 for example]. Who is He? He proclaimed Himself God.
- It Means Jesus Can Do What He Promised He to Do-He promised to save and give life [1 Timothy 1:15; Luke 19:10; Matthew 20:28; John 10:10].
What difference does it make? Read 1 Corinthians 15:12-20. Your faith is based on truth; your sins are forgiven; you have the hope of eternal life and of a future resurrection!
Post Easter Article
www.washingtonpost.com
Sunday, April 16, 2006
He Is Risen Indeed!
He is risen indeed!
Friday, April 14, 2006
Good Friday
Sunday is coming!
Thursday, April 13, 2006
Commentaries--Gospels
Matthew
Blomberg, Craig. Matthew. NAC. Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 1992. This is the best commentary for pastors available.
Broadus, J. A. The Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids: Kregel [1886] 1990. One of the best older commentaries available from a Southern Baptist giant.
Carson, D. A. "Matthew." In EBC, ed. Frank E. Gaebelein, vol. 8 Matthew-Luke. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1984. Excellent but I like Blomberg more.
Morris, Leon. The Gospel according to Matthew. PNTC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992. Morris is always a must.
Mark
Brooks, James. Mark. NAC. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1991. This is an excellent volume for the busy pastor.
Cole, Alan. Mark. TNTC. Downers Grove: IVP, 1990. As with the other volumes in this series, it is terse and valuable for those in a hurry to get to the crux of the issue.
Cranfield, C. E. B. The Gospel according to St. Mark. Cambridge Greek Testament Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959. A most important work on Mark.
France, R. T. The Gospel of Mark. NIGTC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002. The best modern work in Greek available.
Witherington, Ben III. The Gospel of Mark: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002. Witherington at his best. This is an excellent work for those interested in modern NT scholarship—plus there are excellent application
ideas found.
Luke
Bock, Darrell. Luke [2 vols]. BECNT. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1994, 1996. The best!
Fitzmyer, J. A. The Gospel according to Luke: Introduction, Translation, and Notes. AB [2 vols]. New York: Doubleday, 1981, 1985.
Green, Joel. The Gospel of Luke. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997. This is another excellent example of a commentary written on the basis of modern NT methodologies [narrative criticism particularly].
Marshall, I. H. The Gospel according to Luke: A Commentary on the Greek Text. NIGT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978. A bit dated sometimes but still excellent.
Morris, Leon. Luke. Rev. ed. TNTC. Downers Grove: IVP, 1995. Particularly helpful to get to the bottom-line.
Stein, Robert H. Luke. NAC. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1992.
John
Blomberg, Craig. The Historical Reliability of John's Gospel. Leicester: Apollos, 2000. Helpful to get a handle on modern issues.
Borchert, Gerald L. John. [2 vols]. NAC. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1996, 2002. Very helpful and often quite devotional. He has an interesting take on the book's overall scheme.
Bruce, F. F. The Gospel of John. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1983. Still one of my favorites.
Carson, D. A. The Gospel according to John. PNTC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.
Kostenberger, Andreas. John. BECNT. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004. Good new commentary from a first-rate Southern Baptist Johannine scholar.
Morris, Leon. Commentary on the Gospel of John. 2nd ed. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995. This is still one of the top commentaries.
________. Jesus Is the Christ: Studies in the Theology of John. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989.
Monday, April 10, 2006
The Question for All-Time
In Matthew's Gospel you can see the answers to that question--the same answers which are given by and large today.
- He is a Prophet [v. 11]--This is a partial but inadequate answer. Jesus was a prophet [Matt 16:14; Luke 13:33], but the Scriptures teach more than that--He is the God/Man [Matt 1:23].
- He is a Threat--Certainly He was a threat to the religious leaders [21:15-16; 26:3-4]. He is still a threat today. To believe in Jesus means to believe what the Bible says about Him and about you.
- He is a Disappointment--He was a disappointment to Judas [26:6-16] as well as the crowds [27:23b]. He was not who they thought He was. Today as well people misunderstand who Jesus is and become disappointed when He doesn't "measure up" or "perform" to their expectations.
- He is a Mystery--Pilate didn't know what to think about Jesus [27:14]. He was a mystery. I admit, it is impossible to fully explain the person and work of Christ. He is, however, no mystery. The four Gospels reveal Him, Acts tells us how He affected the early church, the letters explain more fully His life and work, and Revelation tells us of His complete victory and Lordship.
- He is an Embarassment--That seems to be the reaction of the crowd around the cross [27:39-40]. How can one who claimed to be the Son of God die on a cross? Consider 1 Corinthians 1:18-25.
- He is Savior--Here you must go to Luke 23:40-43. To the dying thief, Jesus was more than a prophet, was no threat, no disappointment, no mystery, and no embarrassment. He was Savior. "He saves to the uttermost those who come to God through Him" [Hebrews 7:25].
Who is Jesus to you?
Friday, April 07, 2006
Gosel of Judas
In today's Star Telegram there is a story from a Los Angeles Times writer with this teaser beginning: "Judas Iscariot, long reviled as history's quitessential betrayer, was actually the best friend of Jesus and turned him over to authorities only because Jesus asked him to." The story goes on to share the virtues of this gnostic writing, which was ruled heretical by the church centuries ago with good reason.
The story goes on to indicate that the Gospel of Judas was written 140 or so years after the death of Christ and is indeed a gnostic writing. Bart Ehrman, the new poster child of the secular press, is briefly quoted in this article.
This is not a big deal and will make no impact. Its newsworthiness is based soley on the continued attempt to disregard the authority and veracity of the Gospels.
For further links on this subject see:
http://www.albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=599
Jesus Walked on Ice?
The telling quote from this story is Nof saying, "If you ask me if I believe someone walked on water, no, I don't . . . Maybe somebody walked on the ice, I don't know. I believe something natural was there that explains it."
Something natural explains it. Professor Nof joins a long line of people who for two millennia have tried to explaim away the miraculous.
If Jesus is God, walking on water is no problem!
Poll Results
Al Mohler is quoted as saying in the story: "This reflects a very low state of doctrinal teaching in our churches . . . I am continually confronted by Christians, even active members of major churches, who have never heard this taught in their local congregations . . . We have the lowest-common-denominator Christianity being taught in so many denominations that has produced a people who simply do not know some of the basic Christian truths."
What is weird here is that 63% believe Jesus rose again. Let's remember 1 Corinthians 15:12: Now if Christ is preached as raised from the dead, how can some of you say, “There is no resurrection of the dead”?
For more on the poll see:
www.shns.com
By the way, I agree with Dr. Mohler on his assessent of things. He would be glad to know that I taught 1 Cor 15 just last Wednesday night at Riverside. By the way, another factor in all this could be that more people are being influenced by the American version of Eastern mysticism.
Thursday, April 06, 2006
Byzantine Priority
http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/vol06/Robinson2001.html
Thanks for that!
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
Intercessory Prayer Study
Among patients who received prayers, 59% of the patients who knew they were being prayed for developed a complication, versus 52% of those who were told that it was only a possibility that someone would be praying for them.
I've been hearing all week--"Prayer has no effect on the sick." I don't think I need a scientific study to determine whether or not Christians should pray for the sick. Dr. David Stevens, executive director of the Christian Medical and Dental Associations, said he believes intercessory prayer can influence medical outcomes, but that science is not equipped to explore it. He is quoted as saying: "Do we control God through prayer? Theologians would say absolutely not. God decides sometimes to intervene, and sometimes not...I don't think...it's going to stop people praying for the sick." [Source: AP story reported in The Las Vegas Sun].
I was just studying 1 Thessalonians 1. Paul told the church he was always praying for them. That is not the only time Paul writes of his constant intercessory prayer. I think he believed in it!
So did James--"Is anyone sick? Then he must call for the elders of the church and they are to pray over him . . . The effective prayer of a righteous man can accomplish much" [James 5:14, 16 NASB].
Baptism of Tertullian & Cyprian
Tertullian indicated in his treatise, De Baptismo, that baptism candidates received "pre-baptismal instruction . . . Prior to the cermony, the candidate engaged in prayer, fasting, humility, a nightlong vigil, and confession of sin . . .The final step toward baptism was the renunciation of Satan . . . baptism was conducted by triple immersion in the name of the Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit . . . After emerging from the baptismal water, the one newly baptized was anointed with consecrated oil, was signed with the cross, and had the administrator's hands imposed in welcome of the Holy Spirit . . . The new members of the church then joined the congregation for prayers and for their first celebration of the Eucharist, at which time they were given a drink of milk and honey, which symbolized the Promised Land."
Baptism in no way washes sins away; nor does it save in any way. I am struck, however, at the rich biblical symbolism involved in the ceremony described in part above. While I still might want a simpler ceremony, which seems more in line with the New Testament, I do think we can learn from this ancient church practice. Should there not be a more compelling baptismal service than what we have most of the time? Do we glorify God and encourage the baptismal candidate by just tacking the baptism on to a service, either at the beginning or at the end? We Baptists strongly embrace "believer's baptism," but do we really think it is a significant part of a corporate worship service?
Just some musings about baptism and Baptist church practice.
Church Lite
- 24% few commitments
- Home of the 7.5% tithe
- 15-minute sermons
- 45-minute worship services
- We have only 8 commandments--your choice
- We use only 3 spiritual laws
- We have only an 800-year millennium
- Everything you wanted in a church...and less!
Sounds like one that will grow into another American mega-church!
Baseball Is Here!
Not everything is so wonderful, of course. The hated Gators are national champs of college basketball. In this sinful world, not everything is perfect.